Safety last: The Economist on CyberSecurity

Forums General News (General) Safety last: The Economist on CyberSecurity

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #21906
      Curator 1 for Blogs
      Keymaster
      • Topic 369
      • Replies 5
      • posts 374
        @curator1

        [ Editors note  see ioTWiki FreshThinking

        The same groupthink. If a burgler breaks into your house you should have done penetration testing?]

        The Economist | Computer security: The myth of cyber-security

         

        COMPUTER security is a contradiction in terms. Consider the past year alone: cyberthieves stole $81m from the central bank of Bangladesh; the $4.8bn takeover of Yahoo, an internet firm, by Verizon, a telecoms firm, was nearly derailed by two enormous data breaches; and Russian hackers interfered in the American presidential election.

        Away from the headlines, a black market in computerised extortion, hacking-for-hire and stolen digital goods is booming. The problem is about to get worse. Computers increasingly deal not just with abstract data like credit-card details and databases, but also with the real world of physical objects and vulnerable human bodies. A modern car is a computer on wheels; an aeroplane is a computer with wings. The arrival of the “Internet of Things” will see computers baked into everything from road signs and MRI scanners to prosthetics and insulin pumps. There is little evidence that these gadgets will be any more trustworthy than their desktop counterparts. Hackers have already proved that they can take remote control of connected cars and pacemakers

        ……

         

        Most important, the software industry has for decades disclaimed liability for the harm when its products go wrong. Such an approach has its benefits. Silicon Valley’s fruitful “go fast and break things” style of innovation is possible only if firms have relatively free rein to put out new products while they still need perfecting. But this point will soon be moot. As computers spread to products covered by established liability arrangements, such as cars or domestic goods, the industry’s disclaimers will increasingly butt up against existing laws.

    Viewing 0 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.