Court rules AI-written article has copyright

Forums General News (General) Court rules AI-written article has copyright

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #40148
      Telegram SmartBoT
      Moderator
      • Topic 5959
      • Replies 0
      • posts 5959
        @tgsmartbot

        #News(General) [ via IoTGroup ]


        Court rules AI-written article has copyright
        A court in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, ruled recently that a work generated by artificial intelligence qualified for copyright protection.
        The ruling came after tech giant Tencent sued an online platform that provides loan information for copying an article written by Tencent’s robot Dreamwriter without authorization.
        The Shenzhen Nanshan District People’s Court said the defendant, Shanghai Yingxun Technology Company, infringed on Tencent’s copyright and should bear civil liability.
        Given that the defendant had removed the infringing work, Shanghai Yingxun Technology Company was ordered to pay 1,500 yuan ($216) to Tencent for economic losses and rights protection.
        The article, published on the Tencent Securities website, noted that “the article was automatically written by Tencent Robot Dreamwriter”.
        Shanghai Yingxun Technology Company later copied the article onto its own website.
        The court said that the article’s form of expression conforms to the requirements of written work and the content showed the selection, analysis and judgment of relevant stock market information and data.
        With the development of artificial intelligence, the technology has been used to generate some traditionally creative works such as music.
        However, whether such works should be protected by copyright is still debatable.
        According to an article published by the World Intellectual Property Organization in 2017, case law in the United States specifies that copyright law only protects the fruits of intellectual labor that are founded in the creative powers of the mind.
        In addition, a court in Australia also declared in a case in 2012 that a work generated with the intervention of a computer could not be protected by copyright.
        “According to our copyright law as well as some international conventions, the definition of a work first emphasizes that the creation is original, reproducible and produced based on human intellectual activity.


        Read More..
        AutoTextExtraction by Working BoT using SmartNews 1.02976805238 Build 26 Aug 2019

    Viewing 0 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.