Memory-processing unit could bring memristors to the masses

Forums IoTStack News (IoTStack) Memory-processing unit could bring memristors to the masses

Tagged: 

  • This topic has 1 voice and 0 replies.
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #23403
      Curator 1 for Blogs
      Keymaster
      • Topic 369
      • Replies 5
      • posts 374
        @curator1

        A new way of arranging advanced computer components called memristors on a chip could enable them to be used for general computing, which could cut energy consumption by a factor of 100.

        This would improve performance in low power environments such as smartphones or make for more efficient supercomputers, says a University of Michigan researcher.

        “Historically, the semiconductor industry has improved performance by making devices faster. But although the processors and memories are very fast, they can’t be efficient because they have to wait for data to come in and out,” said Wei Lu, U-M professor of electrical and computer engineering and co-founder of memristor startup Crossbar Inc.

        Memristors might be the answer. Named as a portmanteau of memory and resistor, they can be programmed to have different resistance states—meaning they store information as resistance levels. These circuit elements enable memory and processing in the same device, cutting out the data transfer bottleneck experienced by conventional computers in which the memory is separate from the processor.

        However, unlike ordinary bits, which are 1 or 0, memristors can have resistances that are on a continuum. Some applications, such as computing that mimics the brain (neuromorphic), take advantage of the analog nature of memristors. But for ordinary computing, trying to differentiate among small variations in the current passing through a memristor device is not precise enough for numerical calculations.

        The memristor array situated on a circuit board. Credit: Mohammed Zidan, Nanoelectronics group, University of Michigan

    Viewing 0 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.